Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1997;33(6):1109-1115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1997.33.6.1109   
Pulmonary Function Changes during Spinal Anesthesia - Bupivacaine vs. Tetracaine -.
Jeon Jin Lee, Woo Jae Joun, Chung Su Kim, Gaab Soo Kim, Tae Soo Hahm, Heyn Sung Jo, Tae Hyung Han, Baek Hyo Shin
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although degree of motor blockade during high thoracic spinal anesthesia is difficult to determine, pulmonary function may reflect the level of motor blockade. So we checked pulmonary function during spinal anesthesia with two different local anesthetic agents.
METHODS
50 patients, ASA PS 1-2, were randomly divided into two groups. After basal pulmonary function test (FVC: forced vital capacity, FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second, PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate, PEP: peak expiratory pressure, PIP: peak inspiratory pressure.), the patients received spinal anesthesia with either 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine. Thirty minutes after injection, level of sensory blockade was checked by pinprick test and pulmonary function test was performed.
RESULTS
Almost all the values of pulmonary function reduced after spinal anesthesia, but the degrees of reduction were not differ in two groups except PEP, which reduced more profoundly in tetracaine group than bupivacaine group.
CONCLUSIONS
It is more desirable that we use bupivacaine rather than tetracaine as spinal anesthetic agent in the patient with poor pulmonary function.
Key Words: Anesthesia, spinal; Anesthetics, local, bupivacaine, tetracaine; Lung, pulmonary function


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next