Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean J Anesthesiol > Volume 77(4); 2024 > Article
Song: Efficacy of remimazolam in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a superior alternative anesthetic for total intravenous anesthesia?
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery. It is associated with poor patient satisfaction, delayed recovery, and high healthcare costs [1]. PONV has several risk factors, including female sex, non-smoking status, history of PONV or motion sickness, postoperative opioid analgesia, and the use of volatile anesthetics [2]. Although some of these factors are not modifiable, choosing appropriate anesthetics to reduce PONV is highly feasible.
This issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology includes a study conducted by Yoo et al. [3] that compares the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia between remimazolam and sevoflurane. Forty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or hemicolectomy were randomized to receive either total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remimazolam/remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane/remifentanil. Patients anesthetized with remimazolam showed a significantly lower incidence of PONV and a reduced rescue antiemetic requirement within the first 24 h postoperatively. The reduction in PONV was most notable in the immediate postoperative period. According to the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire results, patients who received remimazolam scored higher on PONV but had significantly lower scores on “a feeling of general well-being” than those who received sevoflurane. The authors attributed this to worse pain in the post-anesthesia care unit and a higher rescue analgesic requirement during the first 24 h postoperatively in patients who received remimazolam anesthesia.
Midazolam, a relatively short-acting benzodiazepine, is a common anxiolytic agent used in the perioperative period. The antiemetic properties of midazolam, possibly mediated by decreased dopaminergic activity and 5-hydroxytryptamine release, were first reported in the 1990s [4,5]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that intravenous midazolam, administered as premedication, at the induction of anesthesia, or prior to the end of surgery, reduces PONV [6,7]. Midazolam has also been shown to effectively treat acute refractory emesis after chemotherapy [8]. Additionally, the efficacy of midazolam for the treatment of PONV has be shown to be comparable to that of ondansetron [9]. Despite accumulating evidence, midazolam is currently not recommended solely for the prophylaxis or treatment of PONV because of its potent sedative effect. Additionally, propofol, which possesses antiemetic properties and more favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, has become popular as a hypnotic agent for monitored anesthesia care or general anesthesia.
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. Owing to its rapid metabolism by nonspecific esterases, it has a fast onset and offset, a short context-sensitive half-life even after prolonged infusion, and highly predictable and titratable effects [10]. Remimazolam has been shown to be at least non-inferior to propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, with notable hemodynamic stability [11,12]. Because volatile anesthetics are an established risk factor for PONV, TIVA with propofol has been promoted to reduce PONV. However, propofol can predispose patients to profound hypotension, particularly vulnerable populations. Thus, some clinicians prefer induction with midazolam and balanced anesthesia with volatile anesthetics for patients with compromised cardiovascular function.
Unfortunately, current evidence is insufficient to conclude whether remimazolam or propofol is more effective for PONV prophylaxis. However, remimazolam does not appear to increase the incidence or severity of PONV compared with propofol [13]. Therefore, remimazolam has the potential to be a superior alternative to propofol TIVA or balanced anesthesia with volatile agents, especially for patients at a high risk of both cardiovascular instability and PONV.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 6-10.
crossref pmid
2. Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2020; 131: 411-48.
crossref pmid
3. Yoo YM, Park JH, Lee KH, Yi AH, Kim TK. The incidences of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia with remimazolam versus sevoflurane: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol 2024; 77: 441-9.
crossref pmid
4. Di Florio T. The use of midazolam for persistent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20: 383-6.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Di Florio T, Goucke CR. The effect of midazolam on persistent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27: 38-40.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Ahn EJ, Kang H, Choi GJ, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC. The effectiveness of midazolam for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 664-76.
crossref pmid
7. Grant MC, Kim J, Page AJ, Hobson D, Wick E, Wu CL. The effect of intravenous midazolam on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 656-63.
crossref pmid
8. Mandalà M, Cremonesi M, Rocca A, Cazzaniga M, Ferretti G, Di Cosimo S, et al. Midazolam for acute emesis refractory to dexamethasone and granisetron after highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase II study. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 375-80.
crossref pmid pdf
9. Lee Y, Wang JJ, Yang YL, Chen A, Lai HY. Midazolam vs ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 18-22.
crossref pmid
10. Kim SH, Fechner J. Remimazolam - current knowledge on a new intravenous benzodiazepine anesthetic agent. Korean J Anesthesiol 2022; 75: 307-15.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, Sakamoto A, Yamakage M, Suzuki T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J Anesth 2020; 34: 543-53.
crossref pmid pdf
12. Dong L, Sun T, Yang J, Zhou Y, Liu X, Liu Z, et al. Remimazolam has similar anesthetic effect and superior safety compared to propofol in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2024. Advance Access published on Jul 2, 2024. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12273.
crossref pmid
13. Ko CC, Hung KC, Illias AM, Chiu CC, Yu CH, Lin CM, et al. The use of remimazolam versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1101728.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
(서울특별시 마포구 마포대로 109 롯데캐슬 프레지던트 101동 3503호)
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                
Business Name: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (대한마취통증의학회)
Business Registration: 106-82-07194
Representative: Jun Heum Yon (연준흠)

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next