Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2002;42(5):581-586.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2002.42.5.581   
Comparison of Isoflurane, Sevoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia on Potentiation of Muscle Relaxation, Recovery Profile and Cost according to Consumed Amount.
Jang Hyeok In, Dae Woo Kim, Jin Deok Joo
Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. vincnt@chollian.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND
We evaluated the potentiating effect of anesthetics to vecuronium, and recovery profiles, and cost according to the consumption amounts, and usefulness of newly developed anesthetic agents for ambulatory anesthesia.
METHODS
Seventy-five patients undergoing a major gynecological surgery were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 received isoflurane, group 2 received sevoflurane, and group 3 received desflurane. Clinical duration, recovery index, recovery time in each group, and consumption of volatile anesthetics by weighing the vaporizes were measured.
RESULTS
Emergence from anesthesia was more rapid in the group 2 and 3, and there was no significant difference in potentiating effect of anesthetics to a neuromuscular blocker among the three groups. Costs according to the comsumption amount were significantly higher in the group 2 and 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Sevoflurane and desflurane clinically represent a more efficient alternative to isoflurane in ambulatory anesthesia because of their rapid emergence without side effects.
Key Words: Desflurane; isoflurane; recovery; sevoflurane; vecuronium


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next