Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1997;32(3):377-383.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1997.32.3.377   
The Incidence of Gastroesophageal Reflux: Laryngeal Mask Airway vs Endotracheal Tube.
Dong Kyu Cho, Young Pyo Cheong, Tai Yo Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Suck Chei Choi, Yong Ho Nah
1Department of Anesthesiology, Wonkwang University, College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.
2Department of Gastroenterology, Wonkwang University, College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.
3Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There were several studies for the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux associated with the laryngeal mask airway(LMA), but the results of those studies were much different from one another. The authors of this study measured the intraesophageal pH at 5cm above lower esophageal sphincter(LES) to compare the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux associated with the LMA and the endotracheal tube(ETT) in positive pressure ventilated patients during long surgical procedures.
METHOD
Ninety patients scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery with a standardized general anesthetic technique were randomly allocated to receive either a LMA(n=49) or a ETT(n=41) for airway management. The esophageal manometry was carried out for the exclusion of esophageal motility disorders and a probe with a pH electrode was passed nasally into the esophagus and positioned at 5 cm above LES one day before the operation. After that, recordings of pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disorder and for the detection of reflux episodes during and immediate after anesthesia were performed.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the incidence of reflux(pH< or =4) between groups; only two patients in LMA and three patients in ETT had reflux episodes in the removal or arousal phase. All of them had experiences such as a coughing or straining during those phases. There was no clinical evidence of aspiration of gastric contents in either group.
CONCLUSION
In comparison with ETT, use of LMA does not appear to result in increased incidence of reflux in positive pressure ventilated patients during long surgical procedures.
Key Words: Anesthetic techniques; general; Complications; gastroesophageal reflux; Equipment; laryngeal mask airway


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
(서울특별시 마포구 마포대로 109 롯데캐슬 프레지던트 101동 3503호)
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                
Business Name: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (대한마취통증의학회)
Business Registration: 106-82-07194
Representative: Young-Tae Jeon (전영태)

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next